Cisco Vpn Pre Shared Key Decrypt

Posted on

The use of is pervasive throughout the networking industry. However, many organizations are using IPsec in sub-optimal configurations that result in weaker connection security. Many organizations use IPsec with pre-shared keys and weak encryption algorithms and no form of authentication. Organizations should reconsider how they are using IPsec to ensure it provides maximum security for their organization's private communications. Virtually all network professionals are familiar with the Internet Protocol Security standard. The Internet Engineering Task Force created IPsec as a method to secure end-to-end IP communications by providing confidentiality, authenticity and integrity of the data.

Cisco Vpn Shared Secret

Originally, IPsec was a method of authenticating and encrypting IPv6 packets. However, it was such a great idea that it was also applied to IPv4. Many organizations rely on IPsec to secure external communications to prevent against eavesdropping of the embedded application data. IPsec can provide data origin authentication, replay protection, confidentiality, connectionless integrity and access control. IPsec helps prevent against eavesdropping, replay and spoofed packet attacks, Man-in-the-Middle (MITM) attacks and Denial of Service (DoS) attacks. IPsec can perform all of these functions provided IPsec has been implemented correctly by the manufacturer and the administrator has configured in properly on their equipment and in their software.

Encryption Key-- this. Thanks alot it really helped me for understanding how really vpn works with pre-shared key. Having trouble setting up VPN on a Cisco. Software Release 12.3(2)T code introduces the functionality that allows the router to encrypt the ISAKMP pre-shared key in secure type 6 format in.

However, the unfortunately truth is that many organizations have not established their IPsec deployments using the industry best practices. Several years ago Mark Lewis also wrote a great article on the ' that covers these same concepts about IPsec configuration options. Issues with Pre-Shared Secrets One of the first things to mention about encryption is that the security is in the secrecy of the key and not the secrecy of the algorithm. Encryption algorithms are made public so that the industry can vet the mathematics to ensure that the algorithm is secure. In public/private key encryption the security is guaranteed by keeping the private key safe. IPsec deployments operate in much the same way. However, many organizations insist on configuring pre-shared secrets that are identical on both ends of the connection.

Rather than take the time to set up a Certificate Authority (CA) and issue individual keys to each IPsec endpoint, administrators take the easy way out and use the same key on each IPsec endpoint. Therefore, if one endpoint is compromised or physically stolen, all the other IPsec links are vulnerable. Many tunnel-mode IPsec connections can stay operational for years with the same keys. As IT staff come and go the secrecy of that pre-shared key erodes over time. Certificates are much stronger, but take a little bit of extra configuration work.

Feb 07, 2013 There are a couple ways to retrieve a pre-shared key for a Cisco IPSEC VPN. The easiest way is to actually get it from the running config on the ASA.

However, if your organization insists on using pre-shared key then you should have a process of changing them out every few months and using different keys on different connections. Issues with NAT The other significant issue that plagues IPsec deployments is that many organizations make extensive use of (NAT) (or rather Port Address Translation (PAT)). NATs are pervasive in enterprise organizations due to their address-hiding properties and their perceived security benefits. This affects IPsec when the source IP address in the outer header changes as the packet is transmitted from the data source, through the NAT, and received at the destination. This causes difficulties for the (AH) because it preserves the original IP header inside the authenticated header. If the outer header is changed in any way then the inner packet validation fails because the inner packet's source address no longer matches the outer packet's source address and the packet is discarded.

This is why many organizations turn to using to solve this problem. The NAT Traversal technique encapsulates the IPsec packets in UDP port number 4500 (although other ports can be chosen) and encapsulates IKE messages in UDP port 500.

Then as the packet is sent from the source to the destination the inner IPsec packets remain in tack and only the outer IP header is modified with NAT. The issues is that even with NAT Traversal many organization's still can't or don't use AH so their implementations only use (ESP) and ESP-HMAC. As IPv6 is deployed, organizations will use Aggregatable addresses.

These public will not require the use of any NAT function at their Internet perimeters. Therefore, is all nodes start to use Global Unicast IPv6 addresses then there will not be a need for NAT.

Without NAT then we can be certain that the IPv6 addresses of the inner and outer packets will match and we can use AH in combination with ESP for higher-integrity IPsec connections. In IPv6 networks there is no need for NAT to provide for additional IP addresses. The IETF provides great coverage of the issues surrounding 'Local Network Protection for IPv6' and describing why NAT is not needed in IPv6. However, no sooner than I write this, we now have a new IETF 'IPv6-to-IPv6 Network Prefix Translation' has been published. The difference here is that this method provides a 1:1 mapping of IPv6 addresses and there is no need for PAT-type functions to handle an IPv6 address shortage problems as we have with IPv4.

Shared

There is a misconception that IPv6 is more secure than IPv4 because IPv6 mandates the use of IPsec. IETF states that to have 'a full implementation of IPv6' then nodes must support AH and ESP extension headers. IETF states in section 8 that IPv6 nodes must support AH and ESP. However, this is in fact false, because we know that in the 'real world', not all IPv6 devices have the CPU resources required to perform the encryption mathematics.

IPv6 networks could have small sensors that have limited CPU and battery resources so they want to minimize the packets they send and they will not use IPsec. If you haven't seen it yet, there is an extremely funny on the use of IPv6 and NAT. The sad thing is that we have all met 'I like my NATs, they make me feel safe' people during our careers. Issues with Weak Encryption and Hashing Algorithms As time goes on and processors become more advanced so do the capabilities of attackers to brute-force decrypt encrypted data. Year-after-year the encryption algorithms we are using get weaker and weaker because of the advances in the capabilities of the cryptanalysts. For example, years ago the (EFF) and was able to use their cracker 'Deep Crack' to crack a 56-bit key in 22 hours.

Today it can be cracked even faster on modern computers or distributed systems. To this point, the IETF release the, 'Security Implications of Using the DES' recommending not using DES in favor of (AES).

(MD5) and (SHA-1) are Hashed Message Authentication Codes (HMAC) techniques that produce a checksum of the contents of the packet to ensure that the packet hasn't been tampered with in transit. SHA-1 is generally considered cryptographically stronger than MD5 but SHA-1 requires more computing cycles to calculate so SHA-1 is used in environments that require superior overall security. It is commonly accepted that 40-bit and 56-bit symmetric-key encryption are easy to break with a modest amount of computing power. Even 128-bit MD4 (equivalent to 64-bit) has been broken and research has been taking place on the reality of breaking 128-bit MD5. Because of these weaknesses, the IETF has published 'MD5 and HMAC-MD5 Security Considerations' which recommends not using MD5 in favor of SHA-1 and AES-CMAC. For comparison, SHA-1 has a power of 2^80 and RSA-1024 also has a strength of 2^80.

In IPsec there are several different types of encryption techniques used in various parts of the protocol. IPsec uses encryption algorithms, digital signatures, key exchange algorithms, and hashing functions.

Therefore, you must consider each one of these algorithms being used in your implementation of IPsec and see if you can do any better with how you have things configured today. Recently I have seen many organizations using weaker encryption algorithms and I do not want you making the same mistakes. Suite B Cryptographic Algorithms The IETF published an that gives the industry guidance on the recommended 'Cryptographic Suites for IPsec'. The IETF also recommends the use of 'Suite B Cryptographic Suites for IPsec' in.

The National Security Agency (NSA) also recommends the use of ' cryptographic algorithms as part of its Cryptographic Modernization Program. A few years ago Bill Lattin wrote a Network World article titled ' which reinforces the need to use better cryptographic algorithms. Therefore, you should take the advice of these experts and favor the use of Suite B algorithms in your IPsec configurations. Government Encryption Standards Government organizations have specific mandates on the types of encryption that can be used.

NIST has recommended phasing out these older encryption techniques in favor of new ones with increased key-size. If your organization has the need to transmit Sensitive But Unclassified (SBU) data over the Internet and you are using IPsec then you must adhere to the guidance from the NSA and NIST to use stronger cryptographic algorithms. In fact, there is a variety of standards that U.S. Federal organizations must follow regarding IPsec algorithms. The Federal Information Processing Standards standards are published by the National Institute of Standards and Technology and are part of the Information Technology Reform Act of 1996 and the Federal Information Security Management Act of 2002.

Provides information on the use of AES with keys sizes of 128 and 256 bits. Provides information on Digital Signature Standard (DSS) and recommends using Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithm with curves that have 256 and 384-bit prime moduli. Provides information on the Secure Hash Standard (SHS) recommending using SHA-256 and SHA-384. Provides guidelines for the Security Requirements for Cryptographic Modules and the security of the products providing these functions. This standard is being revised into. NIST is a good 'Guide to IPsec VPNs'.

The NIST (soon to be ) provides recommendations on key agreement and negotiation recommending Elliptic Curve Diffie-Hellman (DH) with curves that have 256 and 384-bit prime moduli. The National Security Agency also publishes information on the use of Suite B algorithms. Internet Key Exchange (IKE) The other problem that organizations run into and end up configuring weaker IPsec deployments involves the methods used to perform the exchange of the keys.

The (IKE) protocols is used to facilitate the process of systems exchanging their keys in a secure way. The Internet Key Exchange (IKE) was originally defined in IETF. IKE is used to create Security Associations (SAs) between the IPsec endpoints. There are two options administrators can choose: Phase 1 with Main Mode or Aggressive Mode and Phase 2 with Quick Mode. The Phase 1 process is to establish a secure channel that the second phase can use to negotiate IPsec parameters using the shared secret negotiated in Phase 1. Some organizations use Phase 1 with Aggressive Mode which is a 3-packet exchange rather than the 6-packet exchange of Main Mode.

However, there are significant vulnerabilities when Aggressive Mode is used and we recommend using Phase 1 with Main Mode. Even though IKE is widely used there were improvements that could be made to the protocol. In December of 2005, the IETF published 'Internet Key Exchange (IKEv2) Protocol'. Both the ISAKMP RFC and the IKE RFC are now obsoleted by IETF RFC 4306. The IETF also published 'IKEv2 Clarifications and Implementation Guidelines' Many products are now starting to support so if you have the ability to configure IKEv2 then you should chose the stronger option. Vendor Updates Although the IPsec standards have been stable for many years there are still improvements being made by vendors in their implementations of the IPsec protocol.

For example, newer Microsoft operating systems like Vista Service Pack 1, in Windows Server 2008, and in Windows 7 now have algorithms. Cisco released a of their IPsec client software last year.

Therefore, if you are using older versions of the Cisco IPsec client then you will want to upgrade to the newest versions so your organization can stay up to date. Cisco and other vendors haven't supported IKEv2 for many years but now they are starting to support it. Cisco has support for IKEv2 SHA-2 and Suite B algorithms. The newest ASA firmware 8.4 and now.

Be sure to check with your vendor and see what options are available in their latest versions. Upgrade your software and configure the stronger IPsec methods. Export Control.

Use Shrew Soft VPN Client to Connect with IPSec VPN Server on RV130 and RV130W Article ID: 5037 Use Shrew Soft VPN Client to Connect with IPSec VPN Server on RV130 and RV130W Objective IPSec VPN (Virtual Private Network) enables you to securely obtain remote resources by establishing an encrypted tunnel across the Internet. The RV130 and RV130W work as IPSec VPN servers, and support the Shrew Soft VPN client. Make sure to download the latest release of the client software. Shrew Soft Note: To be able to successfully setup and configure the Shrew Soft VPN client with an IPSec VPN server, you need to first configure the IPSec VPN server. For information about how to do this, refer to the article The objective of this document is to show you how to use the Shrew Soft VPN client to connect with an IPSec VPN Server on the RV130 and RV130W. Applicable Devices. RV130W Wireless-N VPN Firewall.

RV130 VPN Firewall System Requirements. 32 or 64-bit systems. Windows 2000, XP, Vista or Windows 7/8 Topology A top level topology is shown below illustrating the devices involved in a Shrewsoft client to site configuration. A more detailed flowchart illustrating the role of DNS servers in a small business network environment is shown below. Software Version. v1.0.1.3 Setup Shrew Soft VPN Client IPSec VPN Setup and User Configuration Step 1. Log in to the web configuration utility and choose VPN IPSec VPN Server Setup.

The Setup page opens. Verify that the IPSec VPN Server for the RV130 is properly configured. If the IPSec VPN Server is not configured or misconfigured, refer to and click Save. Note: The above settings are an example of an RV130/RV130W IPSec VPN Server configuration. The settings are based on the document, and will be referred to in subsequent steps. Navigate to VPN IPSec VPN Server User. The User page appears.

Pre Shared Key Blackberry

Click Add Row to add user accounts, used to authenticate the VPN clients (Extended Authentication), and enter the desired Username and Password in the fields provided. Click Save to save the settings.

VPN Client Configuration Step 1. Open Shrew VPN Access Manager and click Add to add a profile. The VPN Site Configuration window appears. In the Remote Host section under the General tab, enter the public Host Name or IP Address of the network you are trying to connect to.

Note: Ensure that the Port number is set to the default value of 500. For the VPN to work, the tunnel uses UDP port 500 which should be set to allow ISAKMP traffic to be forwarded at the firewall. In the Auto Configuration drop-down list, choose disabled. Canon 40d firmware update 2.0.

The available options are defined as follows:. Disabled — disables any automatic client configurations. IKE Config Pull — Allows setting requests from a computer by the client. With the support of the Pull method by the computer, the request returns a list of settings that are supported by the client. IKE Config Push — Gives a computer the opportunity to offer settings to the client through the configuration process. With the support of the Push method by the computer, the request returns a list of settings that are supported by the client. DHCP Over IPSec — Gives the client the opportunity to request settings from the computer through DHCP over IPSec.

In the Local Host section, choose Use an existing adapter and current address in the Adapter Mode drop-down list. The available options are defined as follows:. Use a virtual adapter and assigned address — Allows the client to use a virtual adapter with a specified address as the source for its IPsec communications. Use a virtual adapter and random address — Allows the client to use a virtual adapter with a random address as the source for its IPsec communications. Use an existing adapter and current address — Allows the client to only use its existing, physical adapter with its current address as the source for its IPsec communications.

Click on the Client tab. In the NAT Traversal drop-down list, select the same setting you configured on the RV130/RV130W for NAT Traversal in the article The available Network Address Translation Traversal (NATT) menu options are defined as follows:. Disable — The NATT protocol extensions will not be used. Enable — The NATT protocol extensions will only be used if the VPN Gateway indicates support during negotiations and NAT is detected.

Force-Draft — The Draft version of the NATT protocol extensions will be used regardless of whether or not the VPN Gateway indicates support during negotiations or NAT is detected. Force-RFC — The RFC version of the NATT protocol will be used regardless of whether or not the VPN Gateway indicates support during negotiations or NAT is detected. Force-Cisco-UDP — Force UDP encapsulation for VPN clients without NAT. Click on the Name Resolution tab, and check the Enable DNS check box if you want to enable DNS. If specific DNS settings are not required for your site configuration, uncheck the Enable DNS check box. (Optional) If your remote gateway is configured to support the Configuration Exchange, the gateway is able to provide DNS settings automatically.

If not, verify that the Obtain Automatically check box is unchecked and manually enter a valid DNS Server Address. (Optional) Click on the Name Resolution tab, check the Enable WINS check box if you want to enable the Windows Internet Name Server (WINS). If your remote gateway is configured to support the Configuration Exchange, the gateway is able to provide WINS settings automatically. If not, verify that the Obtain Automatically check box is unchecked and manually enter a valid WINS Server Address. Note: By providing WINS configuration information, a client will be able to resolve WINS names using a server located in the remote private network. This is useful when attempting to access remote windows network resources using a Uniform Naming Convention path name.

The WINS server would typically belong to a Windows Domain Controller or a Samba Server. Click on the Authentication tab, and select Mutual PSK + XAuth in the Authentication Method drop-down list. The available options are defined as follows:. Hybrid RSA + XAuth — The client credential is not needed. The client will authenticate the gateway. The credentials will be in the form of PEM or PKCS12 certificate files or key files type. Hybrid GRP + XAuth — The client credential is not needed.

The client will authenticate the gateway. The credentials will be in the form of PEM or PKCS12 certificate file and a shared secret string. Mutual RSA + XAuth — Client and gateway both need credentials to authenticate. The credentials will be in the form of PEM or PKCS12 certificate files or key type. Mutual PSK + XAuth — Client and gateway both need credentials to authenticate.

The credentials will be in the form of a shared secret string. Mutual RSA — Client and gateway both need credentials to authenticate.

The credentials will be in the form of PEM or PKCS12 certificate files or key type. Mutual PSK — Client and gateway both need credentials to authenticate. The credentials will be in the form of a shared secret string. In the Authentication section, click on the Credentials sub-tab and enter the same pre-shared key you configured on the IPsec VPN Server Setup page in the Pre Shared Key field. Click on the Phase 1 tab. Configure the following parameters to have the same settings that you configured for the RV130/RV130W in section of this document. The parameters in Shrew Soft should match the RV130/RV130W configurations in Phase 1 as follows:.

“Exchange Type” should match “Exchange Mode”. “DH Exchange” should match “DH Group”. “Cipher Algorithm” should match “Encryption Algorithm”. “Hash Algorithm” should match “Authentication Algorithm”.

(Optional) If your gateway offers a Cisco compatible vendor ID during phase1 negotiations, check the Enable Check Point Compatible Vendor ID check box. If the gateway does not, or you are unsure, leave the check box unchecked. Click on the Phase 2 tab. Configure the following parameters to have the same settings that you configured for the RV130/RV130W in section of this document. The parameters in Shrew Soft should match the RV130/RV130W configurations in Phase 2 as follows:.

“Transform Algorithm” should match “Encryption Algorithm”. “HMAC Algorithm” should match “Authentication Algorithm”. PFS Exchange” should match “DH Group” if PFS Key Group is enabled on the RV130/RV130W. Otherwise, select disabled. “Key Life Time limit” should match “IPSec SA Lifetime”. Click on the Policy tab and select require in the Policy Generation Level drop-down list. The Policy Generation Level option modifies the level in which IPsec Policies are generated.

The different levels provided in the drop-down list map to IPSec SA negotiation behaviors implemented by different vendor implementations. The available options are defined as follows:. Auto — The client will automatically determine the appropriate IPSec Policy Level. Require — The client will not negotiate a unique Security Association (SA) for each policy. Policies are generated using the local public address as the local policy ID and the Remote Network Resources as the remote policy ID. The phase2 proposal will use the policy IDs during negotiation. Unique — The client will negotiate a unique SA for each policy.

Shared – Policies are generated at the require level. The phase 2 proposal will use the local policy ID as the local ID and Any (0.0.0.0/0) as the remote ID during negotiation.

Uncheck the Obtain Topology Automatically or Tunnel All check box. This option modifies the way security policies are configured for the connection. When disabled, Manual configuration must be performed.

When enabled, Automatic configuration is performed. Click Add in order to add the Remote Network Resource you want to connect to. Remote network resources include remote desktop access, departmental resources, network drives, and secured electronic mail. The Topology Entry window appears: Step 17.

In the Address field, enter the subnet ID of the RV130/RV130W. The address should match the IP Address field in section of this document.

In the Netmask field, enter the subnet mask for the RV130/RV130W’s local network. The netmask should match the Subnet Mask field in section of this document. Click Ok to finish adding the Remote Network Resource. Click Save to save your configurations for connecting to the VPN Site. Return to the VPN Access Manager window to select the VPN Site you configured, and click the Connect button.

The VPN Connect window appears. In the Credentials section, enter the username and password of the account you set up in section of this document. Click Connect to VPN into the RV130/RV130W. The IPSec VPN tunnel is established and the VPN client can access the resource behind the RV130/RV130W LAN. © 2018 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.